![]() ![]() In CVData, I put in the exact same rules and betting strategy and get the following results: After messing with it for hours before this post, I revisited the software and have it running properly. Move forward with a defined betting spread on one hand, because youre not able to return to two hands after dropping to one hand. ![]() 18 indices from -1 to 99, with half deck resolution (rounded) and sidecount aces. Is there any way to sim this in CVData: Start out with two hands Drop out of two hands at a specified negative true count. In CVCX, I put in the following rules: Single deck H17 DAS, 3 players, 50% pen, split to 4 hands, Backcount 0, spread $25 to $100, play two hands, min chip size $25. What could I be doing wrong? Are there differences between the two sims I'm missing here? I like playing around in CVData for the more advanced features after I get a betting ramp from CVCX to start with, but even if I make sure to set up all the rules identically to begin with, the results are always notably different. Usually CVCX shows better win rates with roughly the same std dev. Then I put that strategy into CVData, but for the life of me I cannot get the outcomes to come out the same. When analyzing a new table I've come across, I usually start out in CVCX to get an optimal betting ramp for a rule set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |